1,410 research outputs found

    Boundary integral methods in high frequency scattering

    Get PDF
    In this article we review recent progress on the design, analysis and implementation of numerical-asymptotic boundary integral methods for the computation of frequency-domain acoustic scattering in a homogeneous unbounded medium by a bounded obstacle. The main aim of the methods is to allow computation of scattering at arbitrarily high frequency with finite computational resources

    Domain Decomposition preconditioning for high-frequency Helmholtz problems with absorption

    Get PDF
    In this paper we give new results on domain decomposition preconditioners for GMRES when computing piecewise-linear finite-element approximations of the Helmholtz equation āˆ’Ī”uāˆ’(k2+iĪµ)u=f-\Delta u - (k^2+ {\rm i} \varepsilon)u = f, with absorption parameter ĪµāˆˆR\varepsilon \in \mathbb{R}. Multigrid approximations of this equation with Īµ=Ģø0\varepsilon \not= 0 are commonly used as preconditioners for the pure Helmholtz case (Īµ=0\varepsilon = 0). However a rigorous theory for such (so-called "shifted Laplace") preconditioners, either for the pure Helmholtz equation, or even the absorptive equation (Īµ=Ģø0\varepsilon \not=0), is still missing. We present a new theory for the absorptive equation that provides rates of convergence for (left- or right-) preconditioned GMRES, via estimates of the norm and field of values of the preconditioned matrix. This theory uses a kk- and Īµ\varepsilon-explicit coercivity result for the underlying sesquilinear form and shows, for example, that if āˆ£Īµāˆ£āˆ¼k2|\varepsilon|\sim k^2, then classical overlapping additive Schwarz will perform optimally for the absorptive problem, provided the subdomain and coarse mesh diameters are carefully chosen. Extensive numerical experiments are given that support the theoretical results. The theory for the absorptive case gives insight into how its domain decomposition approximations perform as preconditioners for the pure Helmholtz case Īµ=0\varepsilon = 0. At the end of the paper we propose a (scalable) multilevel preconditioner for the pure Helmholtz problem that has an empirical computation time complexity of about O(n4/3)\mathcal{O}(n^{4/3}) for solving finite element systems of size n=O(k3)n=\mathcal{O}(k^3), where we have chosen the mesh diameter hāˆ¼kāˆ’3/2h \sim k^{-3/2} to avoid the pollution effect. Experiments on problems with hāˆ¼kāˆ’1h\sim k^{-1}, i.e. a fixed number of grid points per wavelength, are also given

    Analysis of a Helmholtz preconditioning problem motivated by uncertainty quantification

    Get PDF
    This paper analyses the following question: let Aj\mathbf{A}_j, j=1,2,j=1,2, be the Galerkin matrices corresponding to finite-element discretisations of the exterior Dirichlet problem for the heterogeneous Helmholtz equations āˆ‡ā‹…(Ajāˆ‡uj)+k2njuj=āˆ’f\nabla\cdot (A_j \nabla u_j) + k^2 n_j u_j= -f. How small must āˆ„A1āˆ’A2āˆ„Lq\|A_1 -A_2\|_{L^q} and āˆ„n1āˆ’n2āˆ„Lq\|{n_1} - {n_2}\|_{L^q} be (in terms of kk-dependence) for GMRES applied to either (A1)āˆ’1A2(\mathbf{A}_1)^{-1}\mathbf{A}_2 or A2(A1)āˆ’1\mathbf{A}_2(\mathbf{A}_1)^{-1} to converge in a kk-independent number of iterations for arbitrarily large kk? (In other words, for A1\mathbf{A}_1 to be a good left- or right-preconditioner for A2\mathbf{A}_2?). We prove results answering this question, give theoretical evidence for their sharpness, and give numerical experiments supporting the estimates. Our motivation for tackling this question comes from calculating quantities of interest for the Helmholtz equation with random coefficients AA and nn. Such a calculation may require the solution of many deterministic Helmholtz problems, each with different AA and nn, and the answer to the question above dictates to what extent a previously-calculated inverse of one of the Galerkin matrices can be used as a preconditioner for other Galerkin matrices

    Condition number estimates for combined potential boundary integral operators in acoustic scattering

    Get PDF
    We study the classical combined field integral equation formulations for time-harmonic acoustic scattering by a sound soft bounded obstacle, namely the indirect formulation due to Brakhage-Werner/Leis/Panic, and the direct formulation associated with the names of Burton and Miller. We obtain lower and upper bounds on the condition numbers for these formulations, emphasising dependence on the frequency, the geometry of the scatterer, and the coupling parameter. Of independent interest we also obtain upper and lower bounds on the norms of two oscillatory integral operators, namely the classical acoustic single- and double-layer potential operators

    Numerical methods for integral equations of Mellin type

    Get PDF
    We present a survey of numerical methods (based on piecewise polynomial approximation) for integral equations of Mellin type, including examples arising in boundary integral methods for partial differential equations on polygonal domains
    • ā€¦
    corecore